Higher cyber hygiene of organisations in the country leads to higher cyber resilience, as it becomes more difficult to exploit vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. At the same time, the basics of cybersecurity are becoming increasingly complex and require expert-level knowledge to properly configure IT systems.
The national level of cybersecurity is measured by national cybersecurity centres and specialist companies, such as third-party risk analysts like Bitsight, Security Scorecard and similar organisations that scan the internet – shodan.io, Microsoft, Google. However, none of these organisations provide easily accessible and free real-time data about the country.
The good news is that there is an alternative solution provider – a small, reputable UK company www.hardenize.com, which is currently being used by 3 countries in Northern Europe: Lithuania, Estonia and Sweden (all North European Cybersecurity Cluster (NECC) members). Hardenize aims to maintain and publish national dashboards of cybersecurity hygiene of organisations in different sectors. Monitoring is performed daily, analysing all publicly visible configurations of websites and email systems.
The number of sectors and organisations currently monitored in these countries is as follows:
Overall, the level of the cyber baseline for the organisations listed is as follows:
Summary at the end of August 2023:
Which is a substantial improvement compared to April 2023:
Summary at the end of August 2023:
Which is a substantial improvement compared to April 2023:
Summary at the end of August 2023:
Which is a substantial improvement compared to April 2023:
“What you can’t see, you can’t measure” – was one of the main reasons for Lithuania to create such a dashboard. Lithuania, with its vision to become a prominent high-tech country, needs strong cyber resilience – which requires different methods and standards for cybersecurity approach.
This Hardenize dashboard provides all listed organisations with detailed diagnostics and guidance on how to remediate misconfigurations for administrators and external contractors. In addition, such dashboards provide social pressure on the top executives of the monitored organisations to bring the public cyber facade of their organisations up to the expected cybersecurity baseline – proving their “do care” practices.
You can find the original post by Dr. Vilius Benetis on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/national-public-lists-cybersecurity-hygiene-vilius-benetis/